Glossary // Glossary term Empirical

Peak-end rule

The finding that retrospective evaluations of an experience are dominated by its most intense moment and by how it ends, while its duration is largely neglected. In one demonstration, participants preferred to repeat a longer episode of cold-water discomfort that ended slightly less unpleasantly over a shorter one. For pleasant episodes, a strong peak and a good ending can make an experience remembered as more restorative than its lasting effects justify.

Where the site uses it

Studies behind it

The works the definition rests on, with the level of evidence each was appraised at.

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45

    Level B Experiment

    Supports the claim of duration neglect: retrospective evaluations were little affected by duration. Film clips in the laboratory, not real-life episodes.

  • Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x

    Level B Experiment

    Supports the claim that a majority chose to repeat the longer trial that ended less painfully, consistent with peak and end effects. A single paradigm of mild physical discomfort.