Research note 06
How this site was built by an AI coding agent under Majordomus supervision: the measured timeline of the first release, the kinds of instructions given, what the supervision layer caught, and what cannot be claimed.
Methods
How one could reason about recording a catharsis-like change of state: signals, features, inference and context, baselines, self-report, error costs and ethics, and why every step stays uncertain. Nothing on this site measures anyone.
Question 18
The artwork states the thesis that relief is not resolution in a form an argument cannot reach: a transaction that succeeds completely while the request stays unresolved. Its numbers are artistic values, never data.
Question 13
No. The research notes and advice on this site are general education based on published research, they cannot assess an individual situation, and they do not replace assessment or treatment by a qualified professional.
Question 17
It went from an empty GitHub repository to a verified release in 51 minutes and 36 seconds, built by an AI coding agent under supervision. The timeline comes from records, and no speed multiple is claimed.
Question 16
Every substantive claim on this site has a ledger entry with an evidence level from A to E, a separate confidence rating, its sources, scope, caveat and review date. A claim past its review date fails the build.
Question 11
Instruments record faces, heart rhythms and skin conductance. Emotions are inferred from those recordings, and the syntheses show the inference is weak: no gold standard, no autonomic fingerprint, modest coherence.
Evidence
Every public claim on this site with its type, evidence level, confidence, sources and review date, and an appraisal of each reference. How claims are graded, how art is kept apart from evidence, and how to report a problem.