Studies // Cited work

The preregistration revolution

Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution.

Level D Review doi:10.1073/pnas.1708274114

What this study supports

Supports the definition of preregistration and the argument that it distinguishes prediction from postdiction. Advocacy by proponents of the practice; it does not measure the effect of preregistration on research quality.

Who was studied
Not applicable: a conceptual article on preregistration across disciplines.
Design
Review
Level of evidence
Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.

Claims that rest on it

No claim in the ledger rests on this work yet.