Studies // Cited work
Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development.
Level D Review doi:10.1177/1754073912468165
What this study supports
Supports the claims that appraisal theories share the premise that emotions reflect evaluations of events' significance for well-being, that the family includes several variants, and that critical objections remain. An overview, not a test.
- Who was studied
- Not applicable: an editorial overview of appraisal theories.
- Design
- Review
- Level of evidence
- Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.
Claims that rest on it
Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.
TheoreticalLevel DConfidence HIGH
Appraisal theories share the premise that emotions are elicited and differentiated by evaluations of what an event means for a person's well-being and concerns, and they form a family of related theories rather than one model.
- Scope
- The shared premises of appraisal theories as described by their proponents.
- Caveat
- Variants differ in the number and order of appraisal dimensions and in how automatic appraisal is assumed to be.
Last reviewed · Review due · appraisal-theory-premise
TheoreticalLevel DConfidence MODERATE
Critics, including constructionist theorists, contest whether appraisals cause emotions or are part of how emotional episodes are described and categorised, and this question remains open.
- Scope
- Theoretical debate about the causal status of appraisal.
- Caveat
- Positions differ in degree; many constructionist accounts retain a role for meaning-making that resembles appraisal.
Last reviewed · Review due · appraisal-causality-contested