Studies // Cited work

Neuroticism and emotion regulation through music listening: A meta-analysis

Miranda, D., & Blais-Rochette, C. (2020). Neuroticism and emotion regulation through music listening: A meta-analysis.

Level D Meta-analysis doi:10.1177/1029864918806341

What this study supports

Supports the claim that neuroticism correlates positively with emotion regulation through music listening (r = .22). Pools correlational studies, so it is graded D and does not address effectiveness.

Who was studied
13 correlational studies with 2,641 participants.
Design
Meta-analysis
Level of evidence
Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.

Claims that rest on it

Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.

EmpiricalLevel DConfidence HIGH

People across adolescence and adulthood describe using music to regulate emotion, and self-reported use is associated with preferences for energetic, rhythmic music and with higher neuroticism.

Scope
Qualitative interviews (8 adolescents; 21 adults aged 21 to 70), a survey of 794 students and a meta-analysis of 13 correlational studies (r = .22 for neuroticism).
Caveat
These data describe use and correlates of use, not whether music regulation is effective.

Last reviewed · Review due · music-used-for-emotion-regulation

EmpiricalLevel DConfidence MODERATE

There is insufficient evidence on whether everyday, self-directed music listening regulates emotion effectively, because most research on it is qualitative or correlational and its concepts are used inconsistently.

Scope
Self-directed music use in daily life, as distinct from structured music interventions.
Caveat
Experience-sampling and experimental studies not cited here may narrow this gap; the claim will be revisited at review.

Last reviewed · Review due · music-self-regulation-effectiveness-untested