Studies // Cited work

Avoidance learning: A review of theoretical models and recent developments

Krypotos, A.-M., Effting, M., Kindt, M., & Beckers, T. (2015). Avoidance learning: A review of theoretical models and recent developments.

Level D Review doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00189

What this study supports

Supports claims about past and contemporary theories of how adaptive and maladaptive avoidance is acquired and maintained and their clinical implications. Narrative review; the underlying experiments are largely laboratory fear-conditioning studies.

Who was studied
Not applicable: a narrative review of theories and experiments on avoidance learning.
Design
Review
Level of evidence
Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.

Claims that rest on it

Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence MODERATE

Two-factor and later theories of avoidance learning propose that avoidance is acquired through fear learning and maintained because it ends or prevents an aversive state, which also prevents the learning that the feared outcome would not have occurred.

Scope
Learning theories grounded mainly in laboratory fear-conditioning research.
Caveat
Contemporary models add cognitive and goal-directed processes, and not all avoidance is maladaptive.

Last reviewed · Review due · avoidance-maintained-by-relief