Studies // Cited work

Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment

Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Level D Theory doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152

What this study supports

Supports the claim that experiential avoidance was proposed as a process common to many psychological difficulties. A theoretical argument drawing on diverse research, not a direct test.

Who was studied
Not applicable: a theoretical review proposing experiential avoidance as a functional dimension.
Design
Theory
Level of evidence
Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.

Claims that rest on it

Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence MODERATE

A behaviour that removes an aversive state is negatively reinforced whether or not it addresses the source, and experiential avoidance has been proposed as a process common to many psychological difficulties.

Scope
Learning theory and a functional account of psychopathology, applied here to cathartic experiences.
Caveat
Applying these principles to nights out or collective release is an inference, not a tested finding; not every cathartic experience is avoidance.

Last reviewed · Review due · relief-negative-reinforcement

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence MODERATE

Relief changes how a state feels and resolution changes the conditions that produce it; relief has value of its own but, taken together with reinforcement, acute mood effects and memory biases, it can be repeated without the underlying difficulty changing.

Scope
The project's central argument, synthesised from separate lines of research.
Caveat
No study cited here tested the full loop directly; the argument is a synthesis and could be wrong for particular people or activities.

Last reviewed · Review due · relief-not-resolution-thesis

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence LOW

A short next-day review of what changed after a relieving experience (feeling, understanding, decision, action) is recommended on theoretical grounds and has not been tested as a routine.

Scope
Everyday use by adults without acute clinical needs.
Caveat
Confidence is low because the routine itself has no trial evidence; it rests on theory and laboratory findings about memory.

Last reviewed · Review due · review-what-changed

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence MODERATE

If relief reinforces a behaviour on every episode while the cause of distress persists, a learning account predicts a growing tendency to repeat the behaviour alongside unchanged distress before each episode.

Scope
A theoretical consequence of negative reinforcement, illustrated in the relief-loop model.
Caveat
No cited study tested this loop for cathartic experiences; relief can also accompany steps that do change the cause.

Last reviewed · Review due · relief-habit-without-change-model

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence MODERATE

Experiential avoidance, the unwillingness to stay in contact with painful thoughts and feelings, has been associated with various forms of psychopathology, but the construct lacks theoretical integration and consistent measurement.

Scope
Clinical research on experiential avoidance, mostly correlational.
Caveat
Associations do not establish that avoidance causes difficulties; the construct may overlap with neuroticism and distress.

Last reviewed · Review due · experiential-avoidance-construct-limits