Studies // Cited work
Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.
Level D Theory doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152
What this study supports
Supports the claim that experiential avoidance was proposed as a process common to many psychological difficulties. A theoretical argument drawing on diverse research, not a direct test.
- Who was studied
- Not applicable: a theoretical review proposing experiential avoidance as a functional dimension.
- Design
- Theory
- Level of evidence
- Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.
Claims that rest on it
Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.
A behaviour that removes an aversive state is negatively reinforced whether or not it addresses the source, and experiential avoidance has been proposed as a process common to many psychological difficulties.
- Scope
- Learning theory and a functional account of psychopathology, applied here to cathartic experiences.
- Caveat
- Applying these principles to nights out or collective release is an inference, not a tested finding; not every cathartic experience is avoidance.
Last reviewed · Review due · relief-negative-reinforcement
Relief changes how a state feels and resolution changes the conditions that produce it; relief has value of its own but, taken together with reinforcement, acute mood effects and memory biases, it can be repeated without the underlying difficulty changing.
- Scope
- The project's central argument, synthesised from separate lines of research.
- Caveat
- No study cited here tested the full loop directly; the argument is a synthesis and could be wrong for particular people or activities.
Last reviewed · Review due · relief-not-resolution-thesis
A short next-day review of what changed after a relieving experience (feeling, understanding, decision, action) is recommended on theoretical grounds and has not been tested as a routine.
- Scope
- Everyday use by adults without acute clinical needs.
- Caveat
- Confidence is low because the routine itself has no trial evidence; it rests on theory and laboratory findings about memory.
Last reviewed · Review due · review-what-changed
If relief reinforces a behaviour on every episode while the cause of distress persists, a learning account predicts a growing tendency to repeat the behaviour alongside unchanged distress before each episode.
- Scope
- A theoretical consequence of negative reinforcement, illustrated in the relief-loop model.
- Caveat
- No cited study tested this loop for cathartic experiences; relief can also accompany steps that do change the cause.
Last reviewed · Review due · relief-habit-without-change-model
Experiential avoidance, the unwillingness to stay in contact with painful thoughts and feelings, has been associated with various forms of psychopathology, but the construct lacks theoretical integration and consistent measurement.
- Scope
- Clinical research on experiential avoidance, mostly correlational.
- Caveat
- Associations do not establish that avoidance causes difficulties; the construct may overlap with neuroticism and distress.
Last reviewed · Review due · experiential-avoidance-construct-limits