Studies // Cited work

Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes

Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.

Level B Experiment doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45

What this study supports

Supports the claim of duration neglect: retrospective evaluations were little affected by duration. Film clips in the laboratory, not real-life episodes.

Who was studied
Two experiments with 32 and 96 participants rating aversive and pleasant film clips.
Design
Experiment
Level of evidence
Controlled studies: randomised or experimental designs, and syntheses of correlational work.

Claims that rest on it

Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.

EmpiricalLevel BConfidence HIGH

Retrospective evaluations of experiences are dominated by their most intense and final moments while duration is largely neglected; most participants chose to repeat a longer cold-water trial that ended less painfully.

Scope
Laboratory film clips and cold-water immersion.
Caveat
Applying the rule to remembered nights out is an extrapolation from laboratory episodes.

Last reviewed · Review due · peak-end-memory

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence MODERATE

Relief changes how a state feels and resolution changes the conditions that produce it; relief has value of its own but, taken together with reinforcement, acute mood effects and memory biases, it can be repeated without the underlying difficulty changing.

Scope
The project's central argument, synthesised from separate lines of research.
Caveat
No study cited here tested the full loop directly; the argument is a synthesis and could be wrong for particular people or activities.

Last reviewed · Review due · relief-not-resolution-thesis

TheoreticalLevel DConfidence LOW

A short next-day review of what changed after a relieving experience (feeling, understanding, decision, action) is recommended on theoretical grounds and has not been tested as a routine.

Scope
Everyday use by adults without acute clinical needs.
Caveat
Confidence is low because the routine itself has no trial evidence; it rests on theory and laboratory findings about memory.

Last reviewed · Review due · review-what-changed

EmpiricalLevel BConfidence HIGH

Adding a milder but still unpleasant ending to an aversive episode led most participants to choose the longer episode for repetition, and retrospective evaluations of film clips were little affected by their duration.

Scope
Cold-water immersion and film clips in laboratory experiments.
Caveat
The peak–end average in the model is a simplification of a group tendency, and applying it to real-life episodes is an extrapolation.

Last reviewed · Review due · better-ending-longer-episode-preferred