Studies // Cited work

Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Level D Review doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310

What this study supports

Supports the claim that perceived availability of support buffers stress, while social integration has a main effect. Based largely on observational studies.

Who was studied
Not applicable: a review of studies on social support, stress and well-being.
Design
Review
Level of evidence
Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.

Claims that rest on it

Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.

EmpiricalLevel DConfidence HIGH

Perceived availability of support that matches the needs created by a stressor is associated with protection against its adverse effects, while social integration has a general association with well-being.

Scope
Adults in the observational studies reviewed.
Caveat
Most evidence is observational and cannot fully separate cause from effect.

Last reviewed · Review due · perceived-support-buffers-stress