Studies // Cited work

Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding

Bushman, B. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding.

Level B Experiment doi:10.1177/0146167202289002

What this study supports

Supports the claim that hitting a punching bag while ruminating produced more anger and aggression than doing nothing. A single laboratory experiment with a noise-blast aggression measure.

Who was studied
Angered participants assigned to rumination, distraction or no punching-bag control conditions.
Design
Experiment
Level of evidence
Controlled studies: randomised or experimental designs, and syntheses of correlational work.

Claims that rest on it

Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.

EmpiricalLevel BConfidence HIGH

In laboratory experiments, hitting a punching bag while thinking about a provocation produced more anger and aggression than sitting quietly, and belief in catharsis increased the wish to vent without reducing later aggression.

Scope
Short-term anger and laboratory aggression after brief provocations, mostly in university students.
Caveat
Aggression was measured with standardised laboratory tasks; the studies do not describe long-term outcomes or every form of emotional expression, and they are not about dancing or music.

Last reviewed · Review due · venting-increases-anger

EmpiricalLevel AConfidence MODERATE

The anger curves in the venting model follow the direction of the evidence: lowering arousal reduced anger and aggression in a meta-analysis (g = -0.63), raising arousal did not reduce them overall (g = -0.02), and hitting a punching bag while ruminating increased anger compared with doing nothing.

Scope
Anger and aggression outcomes after provocation; the time course drawn in the model is not measured.
Caveat
Confidence is moderate because the curves add invented timing to pooled effects, and the arousal-increasing studies were heterogeneous.

Last reviewed · Review due · venting-model-follows-direction

EmpiricalLevel AConfidence MODERATE

Physical activity can lift positive affect while leaving anger unchanged: arousal-increasing anger-management activities, including running, did not reduce anger and aggression on average, and exertion while ruminating on a provocation produced the most anger.

Scope
Anger and aggression outcomes shortly after activity, contrasted with positive affect outcomes in daily life.
Caveat
The anger and mood literatures measure different outcomes in different studies; arousal-increasing studies were heterogeneous, so some activities in some contexts may differ.

Last reviewed · Review due · exertion-lifts-mood-but-does-not-discharge-anger

EmpiricalLevel AConfidence MODERATE

When catharsis is operationalised as venting anger or engaging in arousing activity, controlled studies do not support the prediction that expression reduces anger or aggression; arousal-decreasing activities show better support.

Scope
Anger and aggression, mostly in laboratory studies with student samples.
Caveat
The findings concern anger; they do not show that every form of expression is unhelpful for every emotion, and arousal-increasing studies were heterogeneous.

Last reviewed · Review due · catharsis-hypothesis-not-supported-for-anger