Studies // Cited work
Toward a better understanding and conceptualization of affect self-regulation through music: A critical, integrative literature review
Baltazar, M., & Saarikallio, S. (2016). Toward a better understanding and conceptualization of affect self-regulation through music: A critical, integrative literature review.
Level D Systematic review doi:10.1177/0305735616663313
What this study supports
Supports the claim that research on affect regulation through music is conceptually inconsistent and can be organised into goals, strategies, tactics and mechanisms. A conceptual review, not a synthesis of controlled effects.
- Who was studied
- 34 publications from 1994 to 2014 selected by systematic database search.
- Design
- Systematic review
- Level of evidence
- Cross-sectional, observational, qualitative work and narrative reviews.
Claims that rest on it
Each claim states what the site asserts, at what strength, and with what caveat.
EmpiricalLevel DConfidence MODERATE
Discharge, releasing anger or sadness through music that matches or expresses it, is described as one of several distinct music-based regulation strategies, alongside diversion, solace and working through feelings.
- Scope
- Strategy descriptions from qualitative research and an integrative review of 34 publications.
- Caveat
- The original taxonomy comes from eight adolescents, and the literature uses its terms inconsistently.
Last reviewed · Review due · music-discharge-strategy
EmpiricalLevel DConfidence MODERATE
There is insufficient evidence on whether everyday, self-directed music listening regulates emotion effectively, because most research on it is qualitative or correlational and its concepts are used inconsistently.
- Scope
- Self-directed music use in daily life, as distinct from structured music interventions.
- Caveat
- Experience-sampling and experimental studies not cited here may narrow this gap; the claim will be revisited at review.
Last reviewed · Review due · music-self-regulation-effectiveness-untested